Who is the least competetive ?

**confus-ed** · January 20th, 2006, 05:34 AM

Originally Posted by El_Squid

Does pointing out spelling errors make you lose? Would that be competitive, or simply anal-retentive?

Aww .. I just can't speil vury wull sumtims ! ..

But I think it makes you win, which of course makes you lose ...

**Mayet** · January 20th, 2006, 07:49 AM

I couldnt be bothered so much that I am not even going to post a reply in this thread...

**Platypus** · January 20th, 2006, 08:15 AM

Originally Posted by Mayet

not even going to post

I've already done the same - several times...

**rgharper** · January 20th, 2006, 09:14 AM

Originally Posted by Platypus

I've already done the same - several times...

<AOL> Me, too. </AOL>

Except ... now that I think of it ... now that we have, we can no longer claim to be that apathetic. Does that mean that we have now lost ... or is that won ... or ...

Crap. Just when I could have used that quantum computer to calculate all the possibilities here ...

**Platypus** · January 20th, 2006, 09:17 AM

This post is deliberately left blank.

**houseisland** · January 20th, 2006, 09:54 AM

Nothing from Nothing

**El_Squid** · January 20th, 2006, 11:31 AM

Originally Posted by confus-ed

But I think it makes you win, which of course makes you lose ...

Yay! I win, err... lose...

Oh, well. I'll simply change the scope of this contest, reassign it to another section and declare myself the King of the Seven Seas! All Hail Emperor Calamari, the Obtuse!

**constructor** · January 20th, 2006, 12:00 PM

Originally Posted by NooNoo

OK, being at UNI I understand the winner is the loser paradigm, but we must have mission statement encompassing the vision and scope of this thread. For example, a valid loser statement would be "I have signed autographs of every doorman from every Star Trek convention". To leverage this statement as a losing (and therefore winning statement) a scope must be defined which specifies that mentioning Star Trek Conventions within the post is a valid winning subject area.

Thanks to Uni, I am now well versed in documenting projects of this sort using both graphical and textual representations. I am able to use the latest methodologies to acquire the user needs and justify the business case for such a project.

I estimate (using the latest UML based evolutionary spiral RAD/JAD object oriented approach) that this thread will be ready for general use by 2010. RC1 and RFC's can be available as early as next week. Where do I send the bill for the first 2000 manhours?

Sounds like you are in a strong position to get one of those high paid Local Government jobs in the UK using the American Project Management Bull****.
One of the ones where no-one understands the Job description or Job spec (including the thing that wrote it)
£42k+

Then you are a Winner.