|
-
February 27th, 2006, 01:44 PM
#1
Registered User
NCQ OR Bigger Cache
OK, I am looking at getting a new HD. Should I go with a WD Caviar SE16 with 16mb cache with no NCQ or a Seagate Barracuda ST3250823AS with a 8mb cache with NCQ (I would also have to get a Promise SATA300 TX4 controller since my MB (ABIT NF7-S Rev 2) does not support NCQ).
It will hold EQ2 and primarly used for gaming.
Thanks.
-
February 27th, 2006, 03:26 PM
#2
Registered User
I have seen an interesting article recently, looks like NCQ doesn't help at all in a single-user environment (on the contrary, hurts the performance slightly). Most benchmarks show these 16MB WD drives as being better than the 8MB Seagate.
-
February 27th, 2006, 08:14 PM
#3
Registered User
Well I bought the 16mb Cache WD. We will see how it does.
Thanks.
Similar Threads
-
By Orangeman in forum BIOS/Motherboard Drivers
Replies: 9
Last Post: April 26th, 2002, 03:53 AM
-
By bigfun421 in forum Windows NT/2000
Replies: 3
Last Post: August 10th, 2001, 01:11 AM
-
By FrankJ in forum Video Adapter/Monitor Drivers
Replies: 1
Last Post: October 12th, 2000, 01:42 PM
-
By theBeast in forum Tech Tips
Replies: 10
Last Post: August 17th, 2000, 08:07 AM
-
By smoffett in forum Windows 95/98/98SE/ME
Replies: 2
Last Post: April 27th, 1999, 08:11 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks