|
-
January 3rd, 2007, 11:39 AM
#1
Registered User
Can anyone tell me if the system is at it's best config?
can anyone tell me if my pc is running at its best from the cpu-z info below: in particular the memory stick 512mb....
Processor(s)
Number of processors 1
Number of cores 1 per processor
Number of threads 1 (max 1) per processor
Name AMD Athlon XP
Code Name Palomino
Specification AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+
Package Socket A (462)
Family/Model/Stepping 6.6.2
Extended Family/Model 7.6
Core Stepping A5
Technology 0.18 um
Core Speed 1670.4 MHz
Multiplier x Bus speed 12.5 x 133.6 MHz
Rated Bus speed 267.3 MHz
Instruction sets MMX (+), 3DNow! (+), SSE
L1 Data cache 64 KBytes, 2-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L1 Instruction cache 64 KBytes, 2-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L2 cache 256 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size
Chipset & Memory
Northbridge VIA KT266/333 rev. 00
Southbridge VIA VT8233 rev. 00
Graphic Interface AGP
AGP Revision 2.0
AGP Transfer Rate 4x
AGP Side Band Addressing not supported, not enabled
Memory Type DDR
Memory Size 512 MBytes
Memory Frequency 133.6 MHz (1:1)
DRAM Interleave 4-way
CAS# Latency (tCL) 2.5 clocks
RAS# to CAS# (tRDC) 3 clocks
RAS# Precharge (tRP) 3 clocks
Cycle Time (tRAS) 6 clocks
System
System Manufacturer
System Name
System S/N
Mainboard Vendor
Mainboard Model VT8366-8233
BIOS Vendor Award Software International, Inc.
BIOS Version 6.00 PG
BIOS Date 11/02/2001
Memory SPD
Module 1 DDR, PC2100 (133 MHz), 512 MBytes, unknown brand
Software
Windows Version Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Service Pack 4 (Build 2195)
DirectX Version 9.0c
Mr Miyagi, by any other name... (is this sig short enough?)
-
January 3rd, 2007, 09:18 PM
#2
Registered User
Bus speeds for everything seem to be right
Mem module isn't really gonna make much difference to go to a name brand if in fact you aren't getting errors from the module thats in there now.
So I would say yes its as good as it gets
Only suggestion i can make is another 512 to make a gig and I dont see anything really about what video card is in there. Even the video isnt gonna make much for speed differences. It may allow some games to play that wouldnt with the stock video but thats about it.
-
January 4th, 2007, 01:40 PM
#3
Registered User
Thanks Ferrit, the vid's a NVIDIA Geforce 4 MX 440.
Wierd the Memory brand didn't come up eh? The boards EPOX.
The system also has scsi adapter card because i have a DVD-RAM, cdrw, Jaz AND hp scanner 5p, attached.
-
January 4th, 2007, 09:05 PM
#4
This would app[rear to be an 8KHA model - this link says it has 1.5 gb memory in 3 slots available: I dunno;
http://tinyurl.com/y3h7ow
-
January 5th, 2007, 02:22 PM
#5
Registered User
 Originally Posted by CCT
This would app[rear to be an 8KHA model - this link says it has 1.5 gb memory in 3 slots available: I dunno;
http://tinyurl.com/y3h7ow
that's right. both this one and the almost identical pc which i use for games have an epox m/b with athlon processors.
-
January 5th, 2007, 05:16 PM
#6
OK -you have No Name ram BUT GOOD no name - great timing numbers as far as I know. If you could match one or 2 more into that board (1 at least) you should see a game performance improvement.
Similar Threads
-
By The Computer Valet in forum Tech-To-Tech
Replies: 15
Last Post: December 5th, 2003, 11:23 AM
-
By asm481 in forum Windows NT/2000
Replies: 19
Last Post: February 17th, 2003, 11:22 AM
-
By Draggar in forum Tech Tips
Replies: 12
Last Post: July 4th, 2002, 03:39 AM
-
By goldmeier in forum Removable/Backup Device Drivers
Replies: 1
Last Post: February 3rd, 2001, 09:41 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks