Thanks for the info GregD. It does seems that printer support for Vista is pretty poor. And DonJ, you really can't blame MS. Vista was in development 7 years! It had how many public Betas? C'mon! It wasn't as though it was a big secret that Vista would require new drivers.

I understand this with printers that are really ancient, but the F50 isn't a dinosaur. Overall, I guess I just have a very high level of frustration with support in general, and software publishers reluctance to embrace the possibilities offered by 64 bit processors, multiple cores, and multi-threading. Can you say "Fat and Lazy?"