-
December 19th, 2007, 09:25 AM
#1
Registered User
When is SP1 being rolled out?
I saw a mention to Service Pack 1 for Vista either being in development or beta but I cannot find it now. I can find no reference to SP1 on the M$ website, does anyone know if and when it will be rolled out?
SMOKING KILLS! If you smoke, give it up now whilst you have the choice
-
December 19th, 2007, 09:43 AM
#2
-
December 19th, 2007, 10:40 AM
#3
Registered User
SMOKING KILLS! If you smoke, give it up now whilst you have the choice
-
December 19th, 2007, 10:43 AM
#4
Driver Terrier
Angie, SP1 is in beta and it's not recommended for production machines or people who don't want to provide feedback on bugs they find or who don't have time to fix stuff....
The word on the street is that it will be released to market in early 2008. It rather depends on what the beta testers find and how long it takes to fix it.
Never, ever approach a computer saying or even thinking "I will just do this quickly."
-
December 19th, 2007, 07:18 PM
#5
Chat Operator
I know i installed it on my home system last week, i've not encountered any major issues as of yet. Some eye candy got disabled, some other security settings got changed on me, but a few minutes of reconfiguring and i was good to go. However, i need to know what's going to happen with the SP's as i'm supporting xp/vista in a retail environment.
Though i know it's hypocritical to say "Do as i say, not as i do", I generaly recommend waiting 1 month after an SP release before installing it.
<Ferrit> Take 1 live chicken, cut the head off, dance around doing the hokey pokey and chanting: GO AWAY BAD VIRUS, GO AWAY BAD VIRUS
-----------------------
Windows 7 Pro x64
Asus P5QL Deluxe
Intel Q6600
nVidia 8800 GTS 320
6 gigs of Ram
2x60 gig OCZ Vertex SSD (raid 0)
WD Black 750 gig
Antec Tri power 750 Watt PSU
Lots of fans
-
December 27th, 2007, 04:35 PM
#6
Registered User
Got Vista running nicely now and I was curious about a service pack and I think it has moved from beta to RC 1 status according to the link provided by CCT
I may hold of on buying Vista 64 bit , I need this to address my 4 gigs of ram
Format c I'm givin er all she's got cap'in !!! )
-
December 27th, 2007, 09:27 PM
#7
Registered User
4 gigs of ram? "640K ought to be enough for anybody."
Just kidding, I have 4 gigs and it makes a world o' difference. I have XP 32 and XP 64bit loaded on my dual boot machine, and the 32 bit side works fine only recognizing 3.5 gigs of it.
" I don't like the idea of getting shot in the hand" -Blackie in "Rustlers Rhapsody"
" It is a proud and lonely thing, to be a Stainless Steel Rat." - Slippery Jim DiGriz
-
December 28th, 2007, 03:26 AM
#8
Registered User
Hey Guts3d does your XP 64 show all 4 gigs of ram when you right click " My computer\properties " ?
Let me know I am just curious , I have read of a bios setting which is called address mapping above 4 gigs or something along that line, and it is set to off by default
I was told that you would need to enable it to get the full benefit, It has to do with how the system address's memory for the different components
Normally everything fits in the 4 gig space so when you drop 4 gigs of ram in there the system can only use 3.5 since the other memory addresses are used for your video card etc , Address remapping fixes this
I wonder how they get away with it on a server
Format c I'm givin er all she's got cap'in !!! )
-
December 28th, 2007, 10:09 PM
#9
Registered User
Originally Posted by format c:
Got Vista running nicely now and I was curious about a service pack and I think it has moved from beta to RC 1 status according to the link provided by CCT
I may hold of on buying Vista 64 bit , I need this to address my 4 gigs of ram
Vista 64 has no issue seeing 4 gigs of ram. Rather its more of an issue with the bios and hardware and saying it can support 8 gigs of ram is not always a guarantee that it will see that at the bios level, Even with the bios updates in place for just that issue.
With mine I found that it needed an increase of voltage to the ram sticks to see and use them.
The Service pack is irrelevant to it.
Similar Threads
-
By TechZ in forum Windows Server 2003 & Windows Home Server
Replies: 0
Last Post: July 26th, 2005, 05:43 AM
-
By TechZ in forum Other Software Applications
Replies: 0
Last Post: June 2nd, 2005, 02:20 AM
-
By TechZ in forum Windows Server 2003 & Windows Home Server
Replies: 0
Last Post: December 7th, 2004, 06:54 AM
-
By tha 4NiK8R in forum Windows XP
Replies: 3
Last Post: January 15th, 2003, 01:01 PM
-
By RedBeard in forum Windows NT/2000
Replies: 6
Last Post: September 10th, 2000, 06:47 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks