Shell Swapping
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Shell Swapping

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Birmingham, England
    Posts
    33

    Post Shell Swapping

    Ever swapped your shell then removed the replacement but then your machine won't boot into Windows? Just boot into DOS open up edit and change config.sys to make sure 'shell = explorer.exe'

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Somewhere South of Sanity
    Posts
    60

    Post

    Since the topic is here, does anyone have any good recommendations for a shell replacement?

    I once saw one that was proclaimed as a great shell for gaming, however when I got home I couldn't remember the name (Atom or Adam bomb? Something Atom..)

    And before anyone suggests Linux as a replacement.. I'm working on that, but I want to explore all my options...

    --So asks Polychronopolis..

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Memphis, TN, USA
    Posts
    345

    Post

    LiteStep is the most fun, but what do you mean by best? Pretty? Stable? Small memory footprint?

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Birmingham, England
    Posts
    33

    Thumbs up

    Litestep is good, but I've personally had a few problems with it. i.e. it don't work. For some reason explorer seems to be super-imposing itself on top (desktop background).

    If any one knows any good shells that have a small memory footprint let me know.

    + Polychronopolis, I do think you should use Linux, it's good if you know how to use it. And if you have Windows as well, then all the better. My computer runs Win2KPro Win95 + Linux and runs fine. <IMG SRC="smilies/cool.gif" border="0">

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Memphis, TN, USA
    Posts
    345

    Post

    Dark2K - try 2xExplorer. It is small, fast, ungodly stable, and free.

    2xExplorer Home

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Colorful Colorado. woohoo.
    Posts
    177

    Post

    Originally posted by dark2k:
    <STRONG>Litestep is good, but I've personally had a few problems with it. i.e. it don't work. For some reason explorer seems to be super-imposing itself on top (desktop background).

    If any one knows any good shells that have a small memory footprint let me know.

    + Polychronopolis, I do think you should use Linux, it's good if you know how to use it. And if you have Windows as well, then all the better. My computer runs Win2KPro Win95 + Linux and runs fine. <IMG SRC="smilies/cool.gif" border="0"></STRONG>

    Are you running win2k? I used to have that problem. There are a few registry entries that you need to change to get it to work right. Check www.ls2k.org for the help files, see if you can find it. If not, email me and I'll send you the address. If anyone cares, here's a LARGE (~4 min on a 56k) pic of my desktop
    www.d3fx.com/pita/images/DaveDesktop2.jpg

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Birmingham, England
    Posts
    33

    Thumbs down

    No, I woz using Win95. How well does it work in Win2K? Oh, and I've found a way to change loads of stuff in explorer. Use a program called TClock (just use Google to search for it) to change the start menu and all that. And there's a program called resource hacker that you can use on Explorer.exe to change menus. I can only seem to change the Start menu properties at the moment. <IMG SRC="smilies/smile.gif" border="0">

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •